2 Comments

  1. Well, in terms of the Margaret Atwood comment, with her selling the rights and just being a consultant, not a writer, I figure they may speak to her when stumped but that’s it. Even then, she may think they have gone places past her imagination at this point.

    As for keeping Fred and Serena, it could very well be a contract thing. It isn’t clear how many seasons they were signed up for so killing them off, or June disappearing from their lives, probably isn’t easy.

    But, at this point, I just see it as them juicing the source material since this is perhaps Hulu’s only real claim to fame. At least in terms of original programming which not only gets good reviews but also awards. I’m not sure of its ratings off hand.

  2. It amused me, in a meta sense, that June refrains from shooting Fred in this episode… in the finale of the 90s movie version, she kills him with a knife – and the filmmakers depicted the murder as totally justified, both as an act of personal vengeance and an act of political resistance against a tyrannical regime. I presume you weren’t aware of this?

    You see, it’s differences like this that serve as a reminder that earlier versions of “The Handmaid’s Tale” aren’t necessarily indicative of where Hulu is headed… sure, earlier I mentioned in the comments section that Gilead falls in the book. But is that what the show will do? Perhaps the Hulu-Gilead will develop new deadly bio-weapons and go on to achieve world domination… I used to put a lot of stock in the fact Margaret Atwood was a consultant on this series, but she’s allowed the show such free reign to make sweeping changes already that it’s obvious now nothing about the original text is sacred anymore.

    Your remark about June falling into a cycle of escape, recapture and then reassignment to Fred was a good point… I never imagined, when reading the book, that June would ever see Fred and Serena again after being loaded into the black van at the end… I imagined that if the resistance were behind the wheel, then she’d be smuggled out of the country, where she’d record her story and then lead a secluded life (perhaps dealing with her neuroses and trauma in a psychiatric institution)… and if captured by the government, she’d be made to go through with the birth in prison, under armed guard. By the time she had done this, Fred and Serena’s corruption would’ve been exposed and they’d be executed, so the baby would be given to some other worthy couple. Then June would be imprisoned and tortured some more to see if she could be rehabilitated and reassigned to another couple. If her conditioning didn’t stick then she’d be shipped off to the colonies… such were the two mutually exclusive fates I imagined for June when I first read the book. I don’t know if you think either is a logical progression from the events seen in Season 1.

    Do you think maybe the writers just felt compelled to keep Fred and Serenade around because they got attached to actors Joseph Fiennes & Yvonne Strahovski? Or felt the audience had got attached to them and thus they’d lose viewers if they took the logical step of writing them out?

    With regards to what you said about the car and odd relics littering the house. Perhaps this Commander, like Fred, has a sinful nostalgia for the materialism of the old days. Maybe Fred knows and uses this information to blackmail him into going along with the plan to host a reunion there. Whatever, it’s been established that some Commanders don’t think the same restrictions apply to them as everyone else. This house isn’t such a blatant flouting of the rules as the Jezebels Club, so it’s more likely to have gone under the radar of the top brass.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.