June eye with a reflection of a cross in it.

2 Comments

  1. In many ways, taking note of your comparisons, it seems violence, or the threat of it, seems to be how the show compensates for how flat the characters were in the book. Yet, like many shows we’ve seen on HBO, while violence, and sex, can tantalize and shock at first, so comes the problem of when you build up a tolerance and are left with what is left.

    Which, at this point of the show, it feels more like those involved are enjoying a cultural relevance and thus are continuing the program to be a symbol of resilience than really trying to craft a plausible story. One that has its ending anywhere in sight and isn’t just trying to use shock value as a means to keep people talking and so it can hold onto its relevance.

  2. Here in Australia, “The Handmaid’s Tale” is being broadcast on public television on the same nights as reruns of “The X Files”… watching the two back to back, I honestly found it hard to decide which of the two had the loopiest depiction of political intrigue… but I can say for sure, “The X Files”, of all things, came across as having more believable characters.

    Why is Lydia even here? Why not let one of the local Washington Aunts handle things? Surely that would be better than flying over someone who has proven in the past to be ineffectual in handling this particular Handmaid? For that matter, why is Lydia the only member of the Aunts that we see doing anything of importance in this show, even after she’s made enough screw ups in handling June that logically she’d be assigned a different case? (Of course, the “real world” reason is obvious – Ann Dowd is on contract and it avoids the extra time/money of casting a new character)

    The scenes where Fred is greeted with approval by the political establishment seem downright surreal to those familiar with the novel – in which the other Commanders have Fred killed because they think he is an embarrassment to their image as a tough regime, and because he has failed to live up to their fundamentalist ideology in his own sex life.

    All this stuff about women having their lips stapled shut is not in the book… a weird thing about this series is that it frequently invents elaborate forms of torture, death and abuse that aren’t in the source material (as if the original didn’t have enough violence already) – but then it shows the worst of these things being inflicted upon minor characters, seemingly for lighter offences than what our heroine has done (and got comparatively lesser punishments for)…. so to me, it’s like every time this show trots out some newfangle torture/abuse/execution it doesn’t shock me that much anymore, and since it’s unlikely to factor into the main plot or the protagonists life, it often feels kinda pointless.

    As for the question of how the show flip-flops on humanising it’s villains…

    I wonder if Serena’s redemption would’ve seemed any more plausible to people who haven’t read the book, if Hulu’s writers had kept the following aspects of the literary-Serena intact:

    – In the book, Serena does not know about the plot to overthrow the US government and has had no hand in designing the structure of Gilead… book-Serena was not a major player in politics, she was just a small-time televangelist who made vague statements about “returning to traditional family values”, but was no more militant than your average republican. She never wrote a manifesto that came to be a touchstone of the Gilead movement.
    – In the book, its implied that the “ceremony” method is not something Serena is comfortable with, and that she may just be doing it because she’s afraid she’ll be killed if she too blatantly breaks the rules. There are many hints that Serena isn’t on board with the Biblical rationalisations for it either. Viewed in that light, you could argue that “the ceremony” is also degrading to Serena in the book, even if it’s not as extreme an ordeal as what June has to go through.
    – Serena NEVER attacks June physically in the book. The scenes in which Serena assaults June and the scene where Serena urges Fred to rape June were all made up for the TV series.

    In the book, Serena doesn’t actually do all that much besides be rude and emotionally manipulative in a passive-aggressive way. Yet the novel treats her with contempt… It is weird that this show constantly invites the audience to feel pity for Serena, after showing her doing EVEN WORSE things.

    The same with Lydia – the show has her lashing out physically more often than her literary counterpart and presiding over elaborate tortures and executions that weren’t in the novel…

    …surely, if you’re gonna humanise a villain and put them on a redemptive arc, you don’t start by making them EVEN MORE violent than they already were?

    It’s a pity, because I think a redemptive arc for Serena could’ve been genuinely interesting, if it had been handled better. I know I’ve got an image as the guy who complains it’s not like the book, but Serena and Lydia are both rather flat characters in the novel. I can see why Hulu thought a different approach might be an improvement… but it takes more than a few pretty speeches and tears to get an audience on the side of a character, their actions matter more.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.