One Comment

  1. As someone who has read the novel multiple times (and seen the 1990 movie adaptation), I’m finding it fascinating to read the perspective of someone who isn’t familiar with the original text… someone who considers the overall story arc mysterious and for whom each development of the plot will come as something of a surprise… it takes me back to how I felt when I first read the novel.

    I’m naturally approaching the Hulu series with certain preconceived notions with regards to how the story should unfold and how the world is depicted, one can’t help but make comparisons when one is familiar with the source material of an adaptation.

    It is interesting that the Hulu series has retained the non-linear, stream-of-consciousness method of storytelling that the novel used, and has tried to incorporate the main character’s internal monologues into voice over narration. Much of the suspense in the book is derived from this, and there are passages where June comes across as an “unreliable narrator” who may be lying, speculating or delusional as a result of trauma. I will be interested to see how the series handles the parts of June’s story that Margaret Atwood’s novel left deliberately ambiguous.

    However, the series has changed many aesthetic details of how this regime is organised in order to “modernise” the story, so the technology, costumes and sets are subtly different… and in order to accomodate racial diversity in the casting, they have changed the policies of the ruling government, who in the novel are white-supremacists that have a plan to systematically eliminate all Jews, Blacks and people of colour.

    The Hulu series also makes the questionable decision of casting younger and more physically attractive actors in key roles, and I’m disappointed that a series so brave in other ways panders to the prevailing TV bias that the leads must always be attractive… for instance, Joseph Fiennes plays The Commander, in the 1990 film adaptation he was played by the considerably older and less attractive Robert Duvall.

    The 1990 movie version of “The Handmaid’s Tale” takes a lot of liberties with the story (re-ordering the events of the plot so they occur in chronological order, cutting out all the flashbacks to “the time before”, removing the internal monologues and racking on an unambiguous happy ending)… but it is more faithful to Atwood’s novel in terms of casting and in it’s visual depiction of this future world. Generally the cast are less conventionally attractive, a little bit older and of the same ethnicity that they were in the novel
    (the 1990 movie of “The Handmaid’s Tale” stars Natasha Richardson in the title role, with Faye Dunaway as Serena, Elizabeth McGovern as Moira, Victoria Tennant as Aunt Lydia and Aidan Quinn as Nick)
    The film was directed by a German filmmaker, Volker Schlondorff and he depicts the inner workings of a fascist society with chilling precision and he doesn’t avoid the issue of racism the way that Hulu’s series does… The Commander openly expresses his racist beliefs to the heroine during their meetings in his study and the way that Schlondorff directs Robert Duvall to deliver various bigoted comments in a casual way makes them all the more sinister…. Schlondorff’s film also contains propagandistic “news footage” which shows Jews and Blacks being “deported”… the 1990 movie version also shows various racist characters who survive in the novel being killed by the heroic resistance in a very humiliating manner and Schlondorff’s camera seems to relish in showing these bigoted fascists get their just desserts. Literary purists tend to scoff at these scenes but I have to admit, I found it satisfying to watch these racist, sexist, homophobic, fundamentalist jerks pay for their crimes against humanity – something that is only IMPLIED in the novel.

    I hope you do read the novel and see the 1990 movie after you’ve watched this show, it contains most of the answers to your questions above, but many are cast in an ambiguous light.

    I’ll just say in response to your question about what religion rules Gilead… it is basically a fictional religious movement that combines all the worst elements of fundamentalist Christianity, Islam and Judaism… hence why pretty much all present day religions are depicted as the enemies of this new, future religion.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.