Anne trying on Marilla's veil.

2 Comments

  1. With it being the 1800s, I think age of consent wasn’t as it is now. Granted, I’m an American, also unfamiliar with Canada’s legal history, but with the way this show is set up I think the idea of Prissy marrying Mr. Phillips was seen as a good thing because of the culture at the time. Teachers were a respected position, he was going to move to the big city and was, at one time, going to support Prissy going to college. So there was a lot to be happy about.

    But, I will admit, her leaving him at the alter, and what follows, is handled rather strangely. Especially for a rather conservative town. The idea a young woman left a man at the alter sounds like something which should be a scandal. One Rachel should have had a field day with.

    I’m starting to think I just don’t know how to pick up on when a character is gay. I just thought he was weird and definitely taking advantage of the power dynamics. Also, using being more intelligent than most people around to woo Prissy.

  2. Granted, I am an Australian, and largely unfamiliar with the legal history of Canada… but didn’t you find it incredibly bizarre that most of the town is so accepting, even enthusiastic, about the idea of a teacher marrying one of his students when she hasn’t even graduated yet?

    I’m not sure exactly how old Prissy is supposed to be (I’m presuming she’s at least 16, hopefully 18) or how old Phillips is supposed to be (he couldn’t plausibly be any younger than 25) – but even given the fact that relationships with an age gap were more common in the 19th century, I was surprised at how casually accepting the vast majority of the community seems to be and how many of Prissy’s peers seem to be overjoyed by the prospect….. never mind the legal issues with regards to “age of consent”, there are serious ethical objections to a teacher becoming romantically involved with a student (and even if said student were a legal adult these would still apply) that nobody brings up.

    Actually, I wasn’t terribly surprised by Cole’s theory that Phillips might be a repressed homosexual… the chemistry between Prissy and Phillips in previous episodes often struck me as strained, awkward and oddly one-sided. Also, he has many stereotypically camp mannerisms that came through during moments of sneering villainy, which made it understandable why Cole would leap to that conclusion.

    Also, much as I’m glad that Prissy didn’t get married to this creep, having her start dancing for joy mere minutes after leaving him at the altar struck me as a really over the top scene, especially given it wasn’t that long ago she seemed to have a real depth of feeling for him.
    (and why were so many people invited to the wedding that – based on their behaviour in previous episodes – neither Phillips or Prissy really like that much? why on Earth invite people you’ve hardly exchanged a civil word to for years to be guests of honour at your wedding?)

    Sebastian’s journey was interesting, and though sometimes heavy handed, seemed like a plausible depiction of a historical reality.

    But I’m afraid the whole Prissy/Phillips wedding shenanigans dragged this down for me and I’d count this as the worst episode of this series so far… frankly I hope Philips gets run out of town and Avonlea collectively decides to forget him. And I’m glad a new teacher is on the horizon. Anne had a nice teacher in the books who was more interesting than Phillips and should’ve been introduced MUCH earlier than this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.