Aunt Lydia noting the death of her nephew wasn't her fault.
Aunt Lydia: It wasn't my fault.

3 Comments

  1. I do not mean to suggest that the way in which Nick was coerced into this relationship is something that should be condoned. I thought I had made it clear in previous posts that I found the whole situation deplorable…. it is an injustice and I agree that the totalitarian system of Gilead is discriminatory against lower-class men (or indeed, any man that has the slightest theological or political doubts) and not just women. I agree with you that it’s right for the show to depict that onscreen.

    I still felt that Nick could’ve handled the situation with more intelligence, if not with more compassion… but then, perhaps that’s my previous familiarity with the novel and movie colouring my judgement. You’re right in saying that the Nick of this series doesn’t handle responsibility well and is written as being rather reluctant to take decisive action… the character of Nick in the novel was a much tougher and more focused character, and Aidan Quinn played him as a determined man of action in the movie. Perhaps I’m expecting too much from the Nick of this series because his literary and cinematic counterparts were somewhat more admirable personalities.

    I agree with your assessment of Serena’s character and the importance of having villains that are not one dimensional. It’s clear that she never expected the philosophy that she originally advocated to be taken to the violent extremes that it eventually was, and now feels trapped, but too proud to admit many of her misgivings.

  2. When it comes to Serena, a part of me questioned why didn’t they see her as a victim of circumstances. Mark seemingly had an idea of who she was and how she lacked agency. Otherwise, why would she not have written more books, be speaking on behalf of Gilead, as she spoke upon their ideals before, and not just be a wife?

    And taking note of previous episodes, I think this one was a further push to show that as much as Serena Joy isn’t a saint, can you honestly say she deserves the life she has? As shown by her interactions with June, you may not agree with her, but she isn’t necessarily a bad person. Like the best “villains,” for a lack of a better term, she does what is right out of consideration more than malice.

    As for Nick? If I remember right, based on his backstory, he is not someone who likes responsibility and Eden is a serious responsibility. One he didn’t ask for. So as much as you have to feel bad for Eden, at the same time there is a need to question if Nick should really just accept his obligation to her. For what does that mean with all the other characters? We are very much outraged how women are treated in the show, but here is one situation where a man doesn’t want to just go along with the system but is being coerced to. Do we not support his autonomy?

  3. In answer to your questions…

    I didn’t really feel that Isaac and Eden looked cute together and I’m not hoping they begin an affair… if anything, seeing what happened to Janine in this episode made me think that Isaac may be a dangerous presence, despite his outward charm and attractiveness. At one point Rita spells out that he has the power to break her jaw on a whim and not be punished… Eden, though she tries so hard to be the perfect embodiment of the regime’s feminine ideal, lacks self-confidence and sophistication. I’m thinking it would be easy for a short-tempered and trigger-happy guard to misinterpret her shyness and awkward demeanour as reluctance to do her duty and then she’d get a beating.

    As to the question of why the letters from Jezebels had the impact they did… I imagine that the broader social structure and official ideology of Gilead are well known. But the fact a group of the ruling class (people who proclaim themselves fit to rule by virtue of their holier than thou understanding of God’s will and impeccable moral character) have set up a sex club where they can indulge their most debauched fantasies is not widely known (even within Gilead, most of the population don’t know of its existence and not even all the other Commanders know about this little club)… the revelation that such a place as Jezebels exists would make huge waves, if only because of the hypocrisy of it. Every other atrocity the regime has committed is at least consistent with their professed theology, but the mere existence of Jezebels is in open defiance of it – which is probably why it brought diplomatic talks to a halt. If Fred’s patronage of Jezebels is named in the letters then it proves that he is a man who can’t even be trusted so far as to abide by laws which HE HELPED TO DESIGN.

    If other Commanders are ignorant of the faction who have been indulging in vice, then the release of these letters would surely alert them to this corruption… and might mean bad news for Fred in Gilead… the novel alludes to the leadership of Gilead conducting purges of corrupt members and hints Fred was killed in one of these. Following the purges, Gilead becomes even more oppressive for a while, before collapsing under the strain of an unworkable system… it would be an interesting take on things if these letters are the catalyst for first a period of greater oppression, followed by the fall of Gilead.

    Did you think Nick is being too much of a standoffish dick to Eden in this episode? Also, were there any moments where you were chilled by the tone of arrogant, condescending self-righteousness in the way the Canadians treated Serena? Both of these things disturbed me in ways I’m not sure the writers intended. I felt that Nick could be making A LOT more effort with Eden… and I wondered if the kind of ethical arrogance displayed by the Canadians reminded Selena of attitudes in the former US, that drove her to embrace fundamentalism.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.