The California No – Summary/ Review (with Spoilers)

The California No, sadly, delivers a more interesting trailer than completed film due to an uncompelling male lead.

Community Rating: 60% (3 votes)

Read our Editorial Guidelines regarding how posts are written and rated and our use of affiliate links.

The California No, sadly, delivers a more interesting trailer than completed film due to an uncompelling male lead.

Director(s) Ned Ehrbar
Written By Ned Ehrbar
Date Released 12/4/2018
Genre(s) Drama, Romance
Good If You Like Generic Male Lead Attracting Far More Interesting Women
Noted Cast
Elliott Noah Segan
Allison Ursula Mills
Jocko Paul Telfer
Samantha Tracie Thoms
Kaley Jordan Hinson

Images and text in this post may contain affiliate links which, if a purchase is made from those sites, I may earn money or products from the company. Most affiliate links contain an upward facing, superscript, arrow.

The California No‘s Plot (Ending on 2nd Page)

Elliott is kind of coasting through life. He is kind of a journalist, he does press junkets, but it isn’t what he is passionate about. He is a married man, but it seems the marriage was something his wife wanted, maybe for a green card, and Elliott was a decent enough guy. Yet, with learning his wife, Allison, is under the impression they are in an open marriage, and she has been seeing other people, that shatters Elliott’s world. Leading him to want someone to talk to, besides his best friend Jocko, and this leading to an awkward situation with a woman named Samantha. Then, something with a woman named Kaley.

Leaving you to wonder, considering the tailspin Elliott’s life is in, will he find stability in any aspect of his life by the time this movie is over?


It Started Off Interesting

Elliott (Noah Segan) and Allison (Ursula Mills) in therapy
Allison (Ursula Mills): Oh, no, I still have a very healthy sex drive.

At first, this movie seemed like it could be good. It had a nice comedic vibe, considering Allison did this whole, Basic Instinct thing in the doctor’s office (I think she was wearing underwear). Then you have Jocko, a masculine gay dude who is clearly in a ho phase, and then you add in Kaley. She is this girl who is cool messing around with a married man, and seems like someone Elliott could fall for.

Allison and Kaley

Though not focused on, as they should be, with these two are far more interesting stories than we get out of Elliott. For Allison, we have the story of an immigrant, from Great Britain, who met and got married to a man within a year. Why? Well, could it have been love, a green card, or did the need for a green card develop into love? If not a relationship of convenience?

Also, there is the need to question with Allison, when it comes to the open marriage conversation, how did it really go, since we don’t see it in the movie? For there are times when you are really left to wonder if she gave Elliott this option but never really did take it herself? That maybe she brought it up so maybe Elliott would put more effort into their relationship, maybe step up as a man and be passionate about the way he dresses, acts, even his work. I mean, there are so many unexplored layers when it comes to her character.

Kaley (Jordan Hinson) and Elliott (Noah Segan) at an art show - the first time they meet.
Kaley (Jordan Hinson) and Elliott (Noah Segan)

Same goes with Kaley. From the moment she asks about Elliott’s morals, before having sex, to her opinion you should have sex on the first date to get it out of the way and get to know a person, the way her mind works is intriguing. Leading to you wanting to know her story, as much as Allison’s. How did she end up a reality TV make-up artist? What in her allows the idea of being a man’s mistress appealing sometimes but too weird the next? Also, what did she see in Elliott? Was it just an experience to talk about in her older years or was there something there? At least until she realized why Elliott is probably having marital issues?


But Then It Became A Drama

However, then the movie switches things up and becomes a semi-serious drama. I say semi-serious for this movie doesn’t have anything which may get you in your emotions. Yes, it is sad Elliott’s marriage is in a terrible place and this comes right when his career is tanking. But, him becoming a serious Debbie Downer sucks away what felt like the film’s hook early on.


Elliott (Noah Segan)
Elliott (Noah Segan)

Leading to the next issue: What reason do we have to invest in Elliott? Are we supposed to feel bad for him just because he is the lead? Just because he seems like a good guy? A part of me wants to say yes but I feel like the film only did so by trying to demonize Allison. Someone who, overall, wasn’t really that bad of a person.

If anything, the problem is that Elliott is coasting through life and Allison got tired of it. Then with Kaley, I feel that we get to experience the early years of Allison’s time with Elliott. An initial interest, decent sex, but then when she really got to know him, she realized he was a good guy who lacked drive. Yet, again, possibly to stay in the US legally, she married him and hoped for the best for she really did love him. However, there came a point, almost a year ago, everything being on her, and he got to just coast a bit through life, doing press junkets he was barely invested in, dried her up. Making it so, whether she was using toys or other men, she might have needed to see what her options were

Could you blame her?

Overall: Mixed (Divisive) | Purchase or Rent On (Amazon)

The problem with this film is it gives us the generic male we see in a lot of shows and movies, and does absolutely nothing to bolster him. Oh, that is besides trying to use the women in the film to make you feel sympathy for him. Be it his wife, who could do better, or his mistress, who barely wants to be claimed by him. Making you anything but sympathetic for him but more so making you wonder why in the world was Elliott written this way? Much less, why is he the star?

Which isn’t anything on Segan but more so on how Ehrbar crafted him. Which damn near had me thinking to label this as negative. However, I will say, Mills and Hinson, while not the focus they should have been, do provide a bit of a silver lining. The kind which leaves them unscathed but definitely leaves you to think Ehrbar wheelhouse may not be writing compelling male characters.

Follow Wherever I Look on Twitter, Like us on Facebook and Subscribe to the YouTube Channel.

 [ninja_tables id=”24271″]

Listed Under Categories: ,

Follow, Like and Subscribe

What Would Your Rating Be?


  1. I think this movie was quite good. He portrayed an entitled milenial who was take take take. In his own mind everyone owed him and he always had a sob story. In retrospect he is realy quite a piece of s@it but everyone liked him cause he’s so easy going. But we all realise he is just a pathetic loser. In the end after failing to latch onto Kaley and getting a punch in the mouth for asking for money from the ex movie star. He ends up back at his wifes door broke pathetic … but will she take him back? I’d wstch the sequel. 7.8 out of 10.

  2. the problem is most people in real life, whether male or female arent the mesmerizing leading men and women we know in movies . It is this unrealistic expectations that can destroy an otherwise stable relationship. thinking that our commitment to a relationship depends on how Interesting the other partner is. Most thing in life arent that way honestly, especially when we mature and grow up. Im criticizing your analysis on hwy the woman would do to that to the uninteresting leading man as you said. But maybe you should also take a good look in the mirror.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.