June embracing a wall.

4 Comments

  1. With regards to the “cultural phenomenon” tag that is often put on “The Handmaid’s Tale”…. do you think this show gets a lot of credit just for being the ONLY show which brings up a lot of these contentious issues? Like, it’s getting “points for effort”, because even if it handles these things in a superficial or implausible manner, at least it bothers to mention them?

    I have a sneaking suspicion this may be the case. It might also be that they want to encourage more ambitious programming, and if something like this can be praised and successful, it paves the way for future, more innovative shows.

    1. I wouldn’t say it is the only show which brings up a lot of the contentious issues surrounding female autonomy, fanaticism, or things of that ilk. However, for Americans, it premiering within months of Trump’s presidency gave it good timing and elevated it immensely. If Clinton didn’t concede the presidency, due to an outdated system, I don’t think the show would be as notable or renowned. So I think it gets less points for effort and more praise for representing a worst-case scenario based on lucking into trying times in American history.

      Hence why there hasn’t really been any real influx of shows, outside of maybe Years and Years, which have created a semi-horror/dystopian style of a near future. At least on any network whose productions I track.

  2. I don’t know… I can’t help but think June being separated from Fred and Serena is something that should’ve happened at the end of Season 1, and that it’s finally happening now is something of a relief, even if it’s a bit late. Given all of June’s very public transgressions, I found it kind of absurd that she’d be reassigned to the same household and kept on such a loose leash, even after that suicide bombing made breeders even more scarce… but logic aside, putting her in the same household meant that Season 2 ended up repeating a lot of dramatic beats that Season 1 had already run into the ground…. at least moving these characters to different locations and having them mix with a different social circle promises some new dynamics at last.

    I hate to sound like a broken record, but this show wouldn’t have such a problem finding things for it’s crowded ensemble of characters to do if it had just killed-off all the characters that die in the book, at the exact point they die in the source material… you have at least SEVEN characters who should’ve been written-out of the series by now – and I’m not just saying this as some literary purist. Choosing to spare so many characters just is counterproductive, even in the context of long form television writing. It not only results in a feeling of diminished stakes, it can make the storytelling feel cluttered and unfocused.

    I’m not all that impressed with the bad stuff happening to Of-Matthew… she’s rather a minor character in terms of screentime and she’s not in the book… the worst stuff in this series tends to always happen to minor characters that aren’t in the source material:
    I won’t be impressed until this series finally has the courage to kill off one of the main characters, one who was introduced in the novel
    (so in other words… kill off Fred, Serena, Nick, Lydia, Moira, Janine, Emily or Luke already, they’ve all had enough implausible reprieves… I’ve given up any hope of June being written out, and just accepted she has “magical plot armour”, being the protagonist and all. But surely that invulnerability shouldn’t extend to all eight of the supporting characters, none of whom got a good ending in Atwood’s original story?)

    Yeah, it is bizarre that Rita hasn’t got a “day in the limelight” flashback episode yet, every other character from the book has… I wonder why. Emily’s backstory was completely invented for the series, whilst Serena’s was substantially expanded.

    Lydia is a composite of several “Aunt” characters from the book. There’s a reference in the book to one of them running a weight-watchers Centre in Iowa before becoming an agent of the regime. Will be interested to see if the series incorporates this into Lydia’s “day in the limelight” episode, or go in a completely different direction.

    1. I agree that this show is overdue for a major death. The only ones they have killed thus far are characters who we’ve barely gotten to know. But, if they were to kill anyone, I feel like it wouldn’t have any impact unless it was Hannah. All the adults you noted, Fred, Serena, Nick, and the rest, as much as they are familiar faces, they just don’t seem worth overly investing in anymore. They just exist and happen to be the people we focus on. However, killing Hannah, while she is someone we also have barely seen, she also has been a driving force for June. So with killing her, it might break something in June. Create a true sense of urgency rather than continue what feels like a rather sluggish tale.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.