Irma, who is alive and fairly well, asking Michael was she really gone for nine days?
"Was I really gone for nine days?"

2 Comments

  1. I kind-of disagree, and would just like to imply that in my personal opinion Irma’s ‘hate’ for Miranda is made up and she actually likes her, as you can see in the kiss scene – and perhaps is attracted to her, which is where I pick up signs of repressed sexuality. You also see that she is annoyed by Marion’s closeness with Greta, perhaps at Christmas thinking that lesbianism is unnatural and resenting herself in order to fit in with society and her parents, who are shown not to eagerly care for her. Though none of this is included in the book, it interests me and I think it is a smart way of demonstrating homoerotic undertones at this point in history. I also see signs of Irma’s repression in her over-the-top speaking of needing a ‘fine man to please her parents’ and her decision to attempt to voice attraction to men to teachers, such as the French one at the rock in the show. I also see this in her jealousy of Miranda’s inkling of an attraction to Mike – she may not be jealous of Miranda, but jealous of Mike.
    This is just my personal view, but I think this a much more in-depth study of the characters presented in the show; separate from the book and the original in many ways. I like to believe this is what the show were trying to hint at, and if they did not it doesn’t make sense to me. Irma kisses Miranda, smiles, kisses her again, is turned down, and then tries to kiss her again, and is shunned, left silent, reflective and disappointed. Later, she states she hates Miranda. This, to me, is repressed sexuality at its finest.

  2. Just a short post to confirm… everything that you found annoying in this episode is completely made up for this series and there is no equivalent scene in either the novel or the 1970s movie.

    Appleyard is an older woman (late 50s or early 60s), but not much information is given about her background. All the information the novel gives is that she immigrated from the UK and has an upper class demeanour. She isn’t really a major character in the novel or film anyway… all this stuff about her being a criminal posing as a lady to escape her ex and her sordid past is an invention of the series I found rather implausible… and I’m kind of glad you (someone unfamiliar with the source material) thinks so too. It confirms that it wasn’t just loyalty to the novel that made me dislike this added twist in the tale.

    Oh, and all that stuff about the beating and lesbian frivolity? Totally made up for this series too. Presumably this was added to pad out the run time and titillate the audience.

    Both the book and 1970s movie hint that Miranda has an ethereal beauty and exceptional charisma that draws people to her, and that in Sara’s case it might’ve been romantic… but they don’t gush on about it like they do in the TV series.

    Also, it’s weird that the actress playing Irma in the series has the same physical appearance that the character of Miranda is described as having in the original… and the actress playing Miranda has the same physical characteristics Irma is described as having in the original… really added to the confusion. I kept thinking the actors should’ve switched roles.

    And yes, Irma does act weird after her return from the rock. But in the 1970s film it is somewhat more subtle, like she’s become cold and emotionally desensitised… rather than her reverting to a childlike state as she does in the series… and in the 1970s film it is left ambiguous if her amnesia is real or not… I don’t know if viewers of the series unfamiliar with the source material might’ve wondered if Irma knew what happened and just isn’t telling them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.